Comment in response to Nick Cohen’s article on Syria censored by The Guardian, perhaps

Friends sent me a link to Nick Cohen’s article in The Guardian, “The West has a duty to intervene in Syria”, Jan 1st, 2012.

I wrote a response to it in the comment box and kept a copy (see below). I posted my comment on The Guardian page after I had previewed it, but cannot find it now.  I would like to be generous and think that I  have made a mistake: my comment is still there but hidden from me, or I didn’t publish it as I imagined I did.  Anyway, it is apparently too late to try again: comments on that page are closed. Hence, I will try to direct attention to it here.

By the way, the majority of responses to the article were ones I would agree with. It was heartening to see so many people with the same anti-war sentiments as mine. If my comment was censored, the only reason I can imagine for the editor doing so is that I gave some hard facts which contradict Nick Cohen’s line. This is only a guess.

(Please, if you find the comment on The Guardian’s page, let me know and I will rewrite this.)


I was appalled at (what I believe to be) the outrageous lies in this article and at the war-mongering. It was Winston Churchill who said that “truth is the first casualty of war”, wasn’t it?  I am sure he wasn’t just referring to the propaganda of Hitler’s Germany. 

I taught English at the British Council in Damascus for two years and  was impressed by the hundreds of Syrian people I met, many of whom worked for the government.  They were not a people and it was not a society capable of the actions described by Cohen.  Now in Australia, I get to watch a lot of Syrian satellite TV; I recommend it for anyone who wants a reality check on what is happening  in Syria.  Syrians are not demons or ogres; in recent weeks they have been out in the street at huge rallies protesting against sanctions and the threat of foreign intervention.  They are crowds like any crowds of reasonable people in any country wanting to be in control of their own affairs and having reason to trust the president to see them through this crisis more than any alternative offered by the opposition. Unfortunately, Al-Jazeera, now the propaganda tool of the emir of Qatar and extremist clerics, has confused so many in the world with its smear campaign against Syria; because it is seen as a trusted source, its distortions and fabrications get repeated in our media. 

I visited Damascus in April and learnt first hand of the killings of soldiers and civilians then. The so-called revolution has not armed recently in order to survive. In April, there was an ambush of soldiers near Banyias which left 9 soldiers dead; it is quite well-documented. Also, the brother-in-law of a good friend was killed on 17th April along with his two teenage sons and a nephew. They were targetted by armed men on a public holiday when they were moving house; presumably they were killed because their car had army number-plates. Their bodies were apparently mutilated.

Much of this sort of violence would have been incited by the calls of extremist clerics, such as Sheik Yusuf Al-Qaradawi and Adnan Al-Arour. The fatwa issued by Qaradawi for people to overthrow the ‘heretical’ government was issued in March.  Al-Arour doesn’t ‘mince words’ in regard to the violence he supports for the cause.   Their calls to kill are abhorrent, but Nick Cohen is making a similar call, really; the rhetoric differs, that is all.

I was encouraged by many of the comments on this page. Not every Guardian reader is taken in by the crudest war propaganda .

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Comment in response to Nick Cohen’s article on Syria censored by The Guardian, perhaps

  1. devratnam says:

    I won’t be surprised if your ‘guess’ is quite correct.

    Below is an excerpt of what the Guardian UK did in a report about Sri Lanka.

    The link for the full article by Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha is:
    From the very start indeed there were efforts to introduce charges of sexual violence and perversity that fell apart when probed. The most vicious of these was a claim in the ‘Guardian’ by a gentleman called Gethin Chamberlain that 11 women had been found with their throats slit by the welfare centres. It turned out that there was no basis whatsoever for this story, and Chamberlain admitted that his source – which he implied was from the UN or an international Non-Governmental Organization – was unreliable. He refused however to retract the story, claiming it was too late by the time I pinned him down, but declared that he had not relied on that source again.

  2. Sophia says:


    Many of my comments on #Syria in #TheGaurdian’s CIF were simply not moderated for no apparent reason or erased after publication. I wrote to protest and even my protests were not published. I don’t read #TheGuardian anymore, they censor their readers.

  3. zenzid says:

    Disturbing to say the least. Thank you for your work and for voicing a rational stance against our western propaganda machinery, that only serves to incite violence on behalf of US, UK, EU, Israeli and banking interests. Their policies are as disgusting as they are murderous.
    I share critical news on Western propaganda against Syria every day now, and try all I can to wake people up. We can only work harder.
    Thank you again and all the best from Norway
    Øyvind Randers-Pehrson

    ( I have taken the liberty to repost your blog “If people really knew…” to my WordPress blog and will continue to spread information that may prevent war and more bloodshed).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s